Appendix: The SAITO Closed Learner-Loop
Source: the original AIDLE proposal’s own framing, reused here rather
than redrawn. First appeared in ~/txt/aidle/2026-06-03-codip-saito-lab-setup.md
(English) and ~/txt/aidle/2026-05-28-saito-uebersicht-de.md (the German
version, same figure). Reproduced verbatim as a diagram, not
reinterpreted.
flowchart LR
WHO["<b>WHO</b><br/>is being asked?<br/><i>learner state</i><br/><i>over weeks-to-months</i>"]
WHEN["<b>WHEN</b><br/>to ask?<br/><i>spacing, retrieval,</i><br/><i>transfer intervals</i>"]
WHAT["<b>WHAT</b><br/>to ask?<br/><i>productive difficulty,</i><br/><i>scaffolded questions</i>"]
L((Learner))
WHO --> WHEN
WHEN --> WHAT
WHAT --> L
L -- "interaction trace +<br/>outcome measurement<br/>weeks later" --> WHO
Fig. 1 — SAITO’s closed learner-loop. The three guiding questions aren’t parallel; they’re sequential and feedback-coupled: learner state (WHO) drives the right moment (WHEN), which produces the next scaffolded question (WHAT); the outcome signal weeks later updates WHO.
What each box actually is, and what SAIL has actually built
The original AIDLE proposal names three implementation components, one per question:
| Question | Component | What it is | Status in SAIL, as of this compendium |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHAT to ask | SSA — Socratic Scaffold Agent | Decides what to say on a given turn: ask a generative question, or stay silent | Built and live. This is sail-judge — the whole subject of the Bandit-Arm Design, Goodhart Taxonomy & GAT chapter. |
| WHO is being asked | STM — Skill Trajectory Model | A longitudinal model of a learner’s state — knowledge, metacognitive accuracy, position in their own skill development — over weeks to months | New territory, not built. Skill Trajectory Models is a scaffold stub, not a design. |
| WHEN to ask | TSS — Temporal Scaffolding Scheduler | Decides the right moment for the next question, review, or transfer task — spacing and retrieval-practice timing over days/weeks, not within one exchange | Not started at all. No compendium section covers it yet. A cross-repo asset scan explicitly found “no precedent found anywhere” for TSS, the same greenfield status as GAT enforcement. |
Worth being precise about what this appendix is and isn’t: it’s the
original pathway, reused so readers have the same map the AIDLE proposal
itself used — not a claim that SAIL has built, or is currently building,
all three legs. Right now, exactly one of three is real. The loop’s own
feedback arrow — “interaction trace + outcome measurement weeks later” —
is itself SAITO’s central bet (measurable capability gain, not immediate
helpfulness), and is the thing the pre-registered mini-study (sail-1uq0)
exists to actually measure, once it runs.